Where a person checks · asked at more than one firm
I just have to trust it. I can trust it, right?
You can trust AI output only as far as you can check it. A person reviews exactly the outputs that would hurt if they were wrong, edge cases are flagged rather than quietly decided, and a human hand stays on the commit. Trust comes from being able to check its work.
Why people ask
That they are being asked to rely on something they can’t see inside.
The longer answer
Sort the outputs by what a mistake would cost. A wrong internal summary is an annoyance. A wrong figure sent to a client is a problem. Review goes where the cost is.
Then make the system say when it isn’t sure. A good build hands the uncertain cases to a person instead of picking an answer.
Where AI falls short
This question was asked out loud in a working session and logged without a name or a company. It was asked at more than one firm, independently.
Related questions
Your brief · 1 of 3
What brings you here?
See what we’d build first at a firm like yours.
Start with one process.
A working session on how your firm actually runs. You leave knowing the first process worth fixing.