Data entry

Type it once, and have every system agree

One system becomes the record everyone trusts and feeds the rest, with alerts when they drift.

Built forQopia FinancialJSI Systems

Sound familiar?

“We type the same information twice”

Today

  • An emailed order is typed into the ERP.
  • Then it’s typed again for shipping.
  • Later the 2 disagree, and someone has to dig.

With Milo Works

  • You pick the system that wins.
  • It feeds the others, so details go in once.
  • Mismatches come to a person to settle.

A few minutes for each record, many times a day.

Work out your hours

How it works

One record your whole team trusts

  1. A personDecides which system winswhen the 2 disagree
  2. The systemReads the entry or the document once
  3. The systemFills in the second system from the first
  4. A personConfirms what changed or didn’t match
Data entry · one runRun 01
  1. Decides which system winswhen the 2 disagreeA person
  2. Reads the entry or the document onceSystem
  3. Fills in the second system from the firstSystem
  4. Confirms what changed or didn’t matchA person
Specimen · sample rows, no client data

Proof

Already running at another firm

A wealth advisory firm kept client details in 4 tools that disagreed. Now the CRM is the record everyone trusts, fed from the back office each morning, with call notes and email attached.

Your options

Data entry automation: 3 ways to do it

  • Option 1

    Buy software

    Best whenYour 2 systems already link, or a connector exists.

  • Option 2

    Build it in-house

    Best whenSomeone can build the link in an integration tool.

  • Where we fit

    Bring in a partner

    Best whenDocuments need reading, or a rule for which record wins.

Software worth looking at first

Zapier, Make and Workato move records between systems, and Rossum, Nanonets and Docparser read invoices and forms into fields. Check for a built-in link first.

What each one costs, and who keeps it running
Buy software
CostA subscription per seat, plus setup time.
UpkeepThe vendor, and whoever owns it on your side.
Build it in-house
CostTheir time now, and each time something changes.
UpkeepThat person.
Bring in a partner
CostA monthly retainer.
UpkeepThe partner, with a named owner on your side.

Questions about data entry automation

Which system should be the one that wins?

The one where the information starts and people already trust it. Where the 2 already disagree, we settle each difference before anything is built.

Can it read PDFs and scanned forms?

Typed documents, reliably. Handwriting and poor scans go to a person.

What happens when a field changes in one system?

The link is monitored, so a break raises an alert before records drift.

Often fixed alongside this

Your brief · 1 of 3

What brings you here?

See what we’d build first at a firm like yours.

Start with one process.

In one working session, we map how this runs at your firm and show you what it’s worth to fix.